π Section 6: Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Approach in the Classroom¶
Section Overview
This section provides a comprehensive exploration of the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach, including its methodology, types, learning activities, benefits, and disadvantages. The term CLIL was coined by David Marsh in 1994 and has become a significant approach in second language education.
π― Learning Objectives¶
By the end of this section, you will be able to:
- Define CLIL and explain its dual-focused aims
- Describe CLIL as a methodology of teaching
- Differentiate between the three types of CLIL (Soft, Hard, Modular)
- Explain the learning types and activities in CLIL
- Analyze the benefits and disadvantages of CLIL approach
πΊοΈ Section Connection Map¶
flowchart TB
subgraph SEC6["π Section 6: CLIL Approach"]
A[3:08 Introduction] --> B[3:08:1 CLIL as Methodology]
B --> C[3:08:2 Types of CLIL]
C --> D[3:08:3 Learning Types & Activities]
D --> E[3:08:4 Benefits]
E --> F[3:08:5 Disadvantages]
end
SEC5["Section 5: Coyle's 4C's"] --> SEC6
SEC6 --> SEC7["Section 7: NCF 2005"]
style A fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
style B fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3
style E fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
style F fill:#ffebee,stroke:#f44336
3:08 Content and Language Integrated Learning Approach in the Classroom¶
Historical Background
For the past few decades, Content Based Instruction (CBI), also popular as Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), has emerged as a new approach in second language education.
Definition by David Marsh (1994)
"CLIL refers to situations where subjects or parts of subjects are taught through a foreign language with dual-focused aims, namely:
- The learning of the subject content
- The simultaneous learning of a foreign language"
David Marsh's Key Statement¶
CLIL Activity Defined
"Any activity in which a foreign language is used as a tool in the learning of a non-language subject in which both language and subject have a joint role."
Core Concept of CLIL¶
flowchart TB
subgraph CLIL["CLIL Approach"]
FL["π£οΈ Foreign<br>Language"] -->|"Used as<br>Tool"| NLS["π Non-Language<br>Subject"]
subgraph DUAL["Dual-Focused Aims"]
AIM1["π― Subject Content<br>Learning"]
AIM2["π― Foreign Language<br>Learning"]
end
NLS --> DUAL
end
MARSH["π David Marsh<br>(1994)"] --> CLIL
style MARSH fill:#ffeb3b,stroke:#f57f17
style AIM1 fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3
style AIM2 fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
Exam Tip π
Remember: CLIL = Teaching language using non-language subjects OR Teaching non-language subjects using language
Bridge β Let's explore how CLIL functions as a teaching methodology...
3:08:1 CLIL as a Methodology of Teaching¶
Key Focus Areas¶
Key Points π
CLIL focuses on helping students:
- Note elements of language within subject textbooks (part of lexis - vocabulary)
- Identify language during content reading
- Achieve specific learning outcomes through task-based activities
CLIL Characteristics¶
| Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|
| Task-Based | Particular language used to achieve specific learning outcomes |
| Lexis Focus | Language elements like vocabulary emphasized |
| 4C's Framework | Coyle's content, communication, cognition, culture/community |
| Integration | Successful integration of subject content and language |
The 4C's in CLIL Context¶
flowchart TB
CENTER[("CLIL<br>Methodology")]
CONTENT["π Content<br>Subject matter"]
COMM["π¬ Communication<br>Using languages to learn"]
COG["π§ Cognition<br>Learning, Thinking<br>Problem solving"]
CULTURE["π Culture<br>Intercultural<br>understanding"]
CENTER --> CONTENT
CENTER --> COMM
CENTER --> COG
CENTER --> CULTURE
style CENTER fill:#ffeb3b,stroke:#f57f17
Language Use in CLIL¶
Characteristics of Language Use
Language use is derived from academic content/subject:
| Aspect | Description |
|---|---|
| Vocabulary | Prevalence of content-related vocabulary |
| Explanation | Language for explanation, discussion, writing about content |
| Cognitive Skills | Language for defining, giving reasons/opinions, evaluation, conclusion |
| Developing Skills | Language for finding, interpreting, analyzing, categorizing information |
Language Simplification in CLIL¶
Key Points π
- Language is simplified to some extent
- But it is NOT structurally graded
- Language facilitates students to browse the content
Coyle's (2010) Three Language Dimensions¶
| Dimension | Description |
|---|---|
| Language 'OF' Learning | Analysis of language needed for learners to access basic concepts and skills relating to the subject |
| Language 'FOR' Learning | Strategies needed for learners to enable the use of target language effectively |
| Language 'THROUGH' Learning | When learners are motivated to articulate their understanding, deeper learning takes place |
Language Skills Development in CLIL¶
| Skill | Focus |
|---|---|
| Listening | Usually an input activity, vital for language learning |
| Reading | Using meaningful content, chief source of input |
| Speaking | Focuses primarily on fluency rather than accuracy |
| Writing | Series of lexical activities through which grammar is recycled |
flowchart LR
subgraph SKILLS["CLIL Language Skills"]
L["π Listening<br>Input Activity"]
R["π Reading<br>Meaningful Content"]
S["π£οΈ Speaking<br>Fluency Focus"]
W["βοΈ Writing<br>Lexical Activities"]
end
L --> R --> S --> W
style L fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3
style R fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
style S fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ff9800
style W fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#9c27b0
Bridge β Let's explore the different types of CLIL implementation...
3:08:2 Types of CLIL¶
According to Bentley (2010)
There are three types of CLIL in curriculum implementation.
Types Overview¶
| Type | Leadership | Time Allocation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soft CLIL | Language-led | 45 minutes once a week | Practised as part of a language course |
| Hard CLIL | Subject-led | ~50% of curriculum time | Practised as a partial immersion programme |
| Modular CLIL | Subject-led | 15 hours during semester/term | Subject taught for certain hours in target language |
Detailed Types Table¶
| Type | Leadership | Time | Context/Setting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soft CLIL | Language-led | 45 minutes once a week | Some content topics taught during a language period |
| Hard CLIL | Subject-led | Almost 50% of curriculum time | Almost half of curriculum in target language; subject reflects what is taught OR can be new content |
| Modular CLIL | Subject-led | 15 hours during semester/term | Subject teachers select topics from syllabus which they teach in target language |
flowchart TB
subgraph TYPES["Three Types of CLIL (Bentley, 2010)"]
SOFT["π’ Soft CLIL<br>Language-led<br>45 min/week"]
HARD["π΄ Hard CLIL<br>Subject-led<br>50% time"]
MOD["π‘ Modular CLIL<br>Subject-led<br>15 hrs/term"]
end
SOFT -->|"Increasing<br>Immersion"| MOD
MOD -->|"Level"| HARD
style SOFT fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
style MOD fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ff9800
style HARD fill:#ffebee,stroke:#f44336
Davies' (2003) Three Models¶
Additional Models
Davies (2003) identifies three different models of CLIL:
| Model | Description |
|---|---|
| Shared Model | Subject specialist and language teacher work together |
| Adjunct Model | Language teacher prepares classes to get students used to classes with other proficient learners |
| Theme-Based Model | Teacher teaches on his/her own to open and construct upon students' own interests |
Bridge β What learning activities are used in CLIL?
3:08:3 Learning Types and Activities¶
Focus of CLIL Approach¶
Key Points π
CLIL approach generally concentrates on increasing:
- Interactive awareness
- Content knowledge
- Language skills
- Cognitive skills through content learning
Interactive Methodology¶
| Aspect | Benefit |
|---|---|
| Interactive | Enables students to explore content |
| Acquisition | Acquire language ability |
| Teaching Strategies | Project-based learning, Problem-based learning |
Types of Activities¶
| Activity Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Group Activities | Group work, team tasks |
| Pair Activities | Conversations in pairs, peer work |
| Class Activities | Class quiz, lead activity |
| Presentation | Poster and oral presentation |
Skills Beyond Linguistics¶
| Skill | Description |
|---|---|
| Team work | Collaborative working |
| Cooperation | Working together effectively |
| Negotiation | Discussion and agreement |
| Meeting deadlines | Time management |
| Project work | Extended assignments |
| Peer revision | Reviewing classmates' work |
Teacher Activities for Language Use¶
| Activity Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Content questions | Subject-related queries |
| Motivating activities | Engaging students |
| Teaching vocabularies | Building lexis |
| Post-reading activities | Focus on critical thinking |
| Cooperative learning | Group-based learning |
| Speaking activities | Oral communication practice |
flowchart TB
subgraph ACTIVITIES["CLIL Activities"]
subgraph STUDENT["Student Activities"]
S1["Group & Pair Work"]
S2["Class Quiz"]
S3["Presentations"]
S4["Project Work"]
end
subgraph TEACHER["Teacher Activities"]
T1["Content Questions"]
T2["Vocabulary Teaching"]
T3["Cooperative Learning"]
T4["Critical Thinking Focus"]
end
end
STUDENT <-->|"Interactive<br>Methodology"| TEACHER
style STUDENT fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3
style TEACHER fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
Bridge β What are the benefits of implementing CLIL in the classroom?
3:08:4 Benefits of CLIL Approach in Classroom Teaching¶
Four Main Benefits
| # | Benefit | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deeper Understanding of Target Language | Links formed between L1, L2, and content foster meta-linguistic skills |
| 2 | Mastery in Subject Content | Potential for revision and deeper learning through key concept reinforcement |
| 3 | Improved Social and Critical Thinking Skills | More opportunities to apply communicative skills |
| 4 | Stronger and More Flexible Brain | Learn IN the language, constantly using and improving |
Benefit 1: Deeper Understanding of Target Language¶
How It Works
Students form links in their minds between:
- First language (L1)
- Target language (L2)
- Content
| Outcome | Description |
|---|---|
| Meta-linguistic skills | Ability to reflect on language and meaning |
| Better grammarians | Children studying L2 grammar improve in native language too |
| Dual lens | Each language studied through lens of the other |
Benefit 2: Mastery in Subject Content¶
Key Points π
Though progress may seem slower initially (due to working in L2), there is potential for:
- Revision and deeper learning
- Key concepts reinforced in language classroom
- Opportunities for reviewing and recycling content and language
Example: Photosynthesis
| Teacher | Activity |
|---|---|
| Science Teacher | Teach how photosynthesis works + introduce L2 vocabulary |
| Language Teacher | Work on presentation skills, explain photosynthesis in L2, functional language for scaffolding, visual aids, handling audience questions |
Benefit 3: Improved Social and Critical Thinking Skills¶
How CLIL Develops These
Same benefits as bilingual people, but with more opportunities to practice:
- Move between language classroom and subject classroom
- Apply linguistic skills to real discussions
Example: History Debate
| Stage | Activity |
|---|---|
| Language Class | Teach agreeing, disagreeing, asking for clarification |
| Application | Discuss historical event and its consequences |
| History Class | Debate whether certain actions should/shouldn't have been taken |
Benefit 4: Stronger and More Flexible Brain¶
Key Points π
- Students do more than just learn a language
- They learn IN the language
- Constantly using and improving
Example: Chemistry
| Stage | Activity |
|---|---|
| Language Teacher | Explains key vocabulary for chemistry |
| Chemistry Class | Use vocabulary in context while conducting, discussing, and writing up experiment |
Benefits Diagram¶
flowchart TB
CLIL[("CLIL<br>Benefits")]
B1["π§ Deeper Understanding<br>of Target Language"]
B2["π Mastery in<br>Subject Content"]
B3["π‘ Improved Social &<br>Critical Thinking"]
B4["πͺ Stronger &<br>Flexible Brain"]
CLIL --> B1
CLIL --> B2
CLIL --> B3
CLIL --> B4
style CLIL fill:#ffeb3b,stroke:#f57f17
style B1 fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
style B2 fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3
style B3 fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ff9800
style B4 fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#9c27b0
Bridge β Despite these benefits, what challenges does CLIL face?
3:08:5 Disadvantages of CLIL Approach in Classroom Teaching¶
Sixteen Disadvantages
CLIL approach has several challenges that educators must be aware of.
Disadvantages Table¶
| # | Disadvantage |
|---|---|
| 1 | Terminology difficult - more time needed for key vocabulary |
| 2 | Balance difficulty - hard to get right balance between content and language |
| 3 | Inadequate materials - CLIL materials and resources can be a serious problem |
| 4 | Content selection - difficult to select suitable content |
| 5 | Linguistic competence - CLIL lacks linguistic competence in L2 |
| 6 | Lexical vs grammatical - language learned lexically rather than grammatically |
| 7 | Not explicitly language-focused - students may find this problematic |
| 8 | Teacher competence - subject teachers may lack language level; language teachers may lack content knowledge |
| 9 | Material production - choosing and adapting materials is time-consuming |
| 10 | Mother tongue use - complexity may lead to L1 use in classroom |
| 11 | High intellectual involvement - CLIL requires significant cognitive effort |
| 12 | Assessment difficulty - assessing content AND language proficiency simultaneously is difficult |
| 13 | Special training needed - teachers require specific CLIL training |
| 14 | Motivation issues - doesn't motivate ALL students to learn L2 |
| 15 | Implementation level - mostly in secondary schools; learners don't need to be proficient in English (Graddol, 2006) |
| 16 | No specific subject preference - no clear preference for which subjects to teach |
Categorized Disadvantages¶
flowchart TB
subgraph DIS["CLIL Disadvantages"]
subgraph CONTENT_DIS["Content Issues"]
C1["Terminology difficult"]
C2["Content selection"]
C3["No subject preference"]
end
subgraph LANGUAGE_DIS["Language Issues"]
L1["Balance difficulty"]
L2["Lexical not grammatical"]
L3["Mother tongue use"]
end
subgraph TEACHER_DIS["Teacher Issues"]
T1["Competence gap"]
T2["Special training needed"]
T3["Material production time"]
end
subgraph STUDENT_DIS["Student Issues"]
S1["Motivation issues"]
S2["High intellectual involvement"]
S3["Assessment difficulty"]
end
end
style CONTENT_DIS fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ff9800
style LANGUAGE_DIS fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3
style TEACHER_DIS fill:#ffebee,stroke:#f44336
style STUDENT_DIS fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#9c27b0
π CLIL Summary Comparison¶
| Aspect | Traditional Language Teaching | CLIL Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Language only | Content + Language |
| Content | Language-based | Subject-based |
| Learning | Sequential | Integrated |
| Vocabulary | Graded | Content-related |
| Assessment | Language skills | Dual: Content + Language |
π Quick Revision Table¶
| Topic | Key Point | Remember |
|---|---|---|
| 3:08 CLIL Intro | David Marsh (1994) | Dual-focused aims: Content + Language |
| 3:08:1 Methodology | Task-based, 4C's framework | Fluency over accuracy in speaking |
| 3:08:2 Types | Bentley (2010) - 3 types | Soft (45 min), Hard (50%), Modular (15 hrs) |
| 3:08:2 Models | Davies (2003) - 3 models | Shared, Adjunct, Theme-based |
| 3:08:3 Activities | Interactive methodology | Group, pair, class activities |
| 3:08:4 Benefits | 4 main benefits | Understanding, Mastery, Thinking, Brain |
| 3:08:5 Disadvantages | 16 disadvantages | Teacher competence, materials, assessment |
π§ Memory Mnemonics¶
CLIL Definition: DSL
- Dual-focused aims
- Subject content
- Language learning
Three Types: SHM
- Soft - Short sessions in language class
- Hard - Half the curriculum
- Modular - Module-based hours
Four Benefits: DMSS
- Deeper understanding
- Mastery in content
- Social & critical thinking
- Stronger brain
Language Skills: LRSW
- Listening - Input
- Reading - Meaningful content
- Speaking - Fluency
- Writing - Lexical activities
β Review Questions¶
-
Discuss the CLIL approach in classroom teaching. (A) [Ans: 3:08 + 3:08:1 to the end of 3:08:5]
-
Who coined the term CLIL and when? Define CLIL according to David Marsh.
-
Explain the three types of CLIL according to Bentley (2010).
-
What are the benefits of CLIL approach in classroom teaching? Explain with examples.
-
Discuss the disadvantages and challenges of implementing CLIL in schools.
-
Compare Soft CLIL, Hard CLIL, and Modular CLIL.
Section Complete β
You have completed Section 6 covering:
- β CLIL Introduction (David Marsh, 1994)
- β CLIL as a Methodology of Teaching
- β Three Types of CLIL (Bentley, 2010): Soft, Hard, Modular
- β Three Models (Davies, 2003): Shared, Adjunct, Theme-based
- β Learning Types and Activities
- β Four Benefits of CLIL
- β Sixteen Disadvantages of CLIL
Next Section β National Curriculum Framework (NCF 2005)