π Section 3: Multi-disciplinary & Inter-disciplinary Curriculum Integration Models¶
Section Overview
This section explores two major models of curriculum integration: Multi-disciplinary and Inter-disciplinary approaches. These models, advocated by Jensenius (2012), provide frameworks for integrating subjects to enhance learning outcomes, active engagement, and real-world application.
π― Learning Objectives¶
By the end of this section, you will be able to:
- Define Multi-disciplinary and Inter-disciplinary curriculum integration
- Explain the characteristics and goals of Multi-disciplinary integration
- Describe the learning outcomes of Multi-disciplinary approach
- List the advantages of Inter-disciplinary teaching and learning
- Outline the steps for implementing Inter-disciplinary approach in classroom
πΊοΈ Section Connection Map¶
flowchart TB
subgraph SEC3["π Section 3: Models of Integration"]
A[3:06 Models Overview] --> B[3:06:1 Multi-disciplinary]
A --> C[3:06:2 Inter-disciplinary]
end
subgraph MULTI["Multi-disciplinary"]
B --> B1[3:06:1:01 Characteristics]
B --> B2[3:06:1:02 Goals]
B --> B3[3:06:1:03 Learning Outcomes]
end
subgraph INTER["Inter-disciplinary"]
C --> C1[3:06:2:01 Advantages]
C --> C2[3:06:2:02 Implementation Steps]
end
SEC2["Section 2: Features & Levels"] --> SEC3
SEC3 --> SEC4["Section 4: Trans-disciplinary & Spiral"]
style B fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
style C fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3
3:06 Models of Curriculum Integration¶
Information
Jensenius (2012) advocated the following three models of curriculum integration:
- Multi-disciplinary curriculum integration
- Inter-disciplinary curriculum integration
- Trans-disciplinary curriculum integration
flowchart LR
subgraph MODELS["Jensenius (2012) Models"]
M1["Multi-<br>disciplinary"]
M2["Inter-<br>disciplinary"]
M3["Trans-<br>disciplinary"]
end
M1 -->|"Increasing<br>Integration"| M2
M2 -->|"Depth"| M3
style M1 fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
style M2 fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3
style M3 fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ff9800
Bridge β Let us discuss Multi-disciplinary and Inter-disciplinary models in detail in this section...
3:06:1 Multi-disciplinary Curriculum Integration¶
Definition
Multi-disciplinary curriculum involves students studying a topic or problem from the viewpoints of more than one subject discipline. It involves drawing knowledge from different disciplines to study a topic fully, in all its dimensions; but knowledge of each discipline stays within its boundaries.
Key Characteristics Diagram¶
flowchart TB
TOPIC[("π Topic/Problem")]
subgraph DISC["Different Disciplines"]
D1["Subject A<br>Viewpoint 1"]
D2["Subject B<br>Viewpoint 2"]
D3["Subject C<br>Viewpoint 3"]
end
TOPIC --> D1
TOPIC --> D2
TOPIC --> D3
D1 -.->|"Boundaries<br>Maintained"| D1
D2 -.->|"Boundaries<br>Maintained"| D2
D3 -.->|"Boundaries<br>Maintained"| D3
style TOPIC fill:#ffeb3b,stroke:#f57f17
Key Points π
- Study topic from multiple viewpoints
- Draw knowledge from different disciplines
- Each discipline's knowledge stays within its boundaries
- Address key learning in all dimensions
3:06:1:01 Characteristics of Multi-disciplinary Integrated Curriculum¶
Information
According to A. Steinberg (1997), the following are characteristics of an effective multi-disciplinary integrated curriculum.
| # | Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Academic and Technical Rigor | Curriculum units are seen via standards identified by National and District authorities |
| 2 | Authenticity | Units use real-world context (community & workplace problems) and address issues that matter to students |
| 3 | Applied Learning | Units engage students in solving problems requiring competencies expected in high-performance work organizations |
| 4 | Active Exploration | Units extend beyond classroom through internships, field-based investigations, and community explorations |
| 5 | Adult Connections | Units connect students with adult mentors and coaches from community's industry and postsecondary partners |
| 6 | Assessment Practices | Units involve students in regular performance-based exhibitions and assessments |
Steinberg's 6 Characteristics Diagram¶
flowchart TB
subgraph CHAR["A. Steinberg (1997) - 6 Characteristics"]
C1["π Academic &<br>Technical Rigor"]
C2["π Authenticity"]
C3["π§ Applied<br>Learning"]
C4["π Active<br>Exploration"]
C5["π₯ Adult<br>Connections"]
C6["π Assessment<br>Practices"]
end
C1 --> C2 --> C3 --> C4 --> C5 --> C6
style C1 fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3
style C2 fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
style C3 fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ff9800
style C4 fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#9c27b0
style C5 fill:#ffebee,stroke:#f44336
style C6 fill:#e0f7fa,stroke:#00bcd4
Exam Tip π
Remember Steinberg's 6 A's (sort of): Academic rigor, Authenticity, Applied learning, Active exploration, Adult connections, Assessment
Detailed Characteristics¶
1. Academic and Technical Rigor¶
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Standards | National and District standards |
| Focus | Curriculum units meet identified standards |
2. Authenticity¶
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Context | Real-world (community and workplace problems) |
| Relevance | Address issues that matter to students |
3. Applied Learning¶
Competencies Expected
- Teamwork
- Problem-solving
- Communication
- High-performance work organization skills
4. Active Exploration¶
| Extension Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Internships | Work-based learning experiences |
| Field-based investigations | Hands-on research outside classroom |
| Community explorations | Local community engagement |
5. Adult Connections¶
| Connection Type | Source |
|---|---|
| Mentors | Industry professionals |
| Coaches | Community partners |
| Postsecondary partners | Higher education institutions |
6. Assessment Practices¶
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Type | Performance-based exhibitions and assessments |
| Criteria | Personal, school, and real-world standards |
| Involvement | Students actively participate in evaluation |
3:06:1:02 Goals of Multi-disciplinary Curriculum Integration¶
Key Points π
The four main goals of multi-disciplinary curriculum integration focus on active learning, career planning, diversity, and community support.
| # | Goal | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Increase Active Learning | Shift from passive to active classroom instruction |
| 2 | Develop Educational and Career Planning Skills | Participate in professional work with employees |
| 3 | Reach a Diverse Population | Express interests, demonstrate unique skills, master material using varied learning styles |
| 4 | Build Community Support | Engage industry, education, and community-based stakeholders |
Goal 1: Increase Active Learning¶
flowchart LR
PASSIVE["β Passive<br>Learning"] -->|"Shifts to"| ACTIVE["β
Active<br>Learning"]
subgraph ACTIVE_FEATURES["Active Learning Features"]
AF1["Students = Center"]
AF2["Real-life projects"]
AF3["Career-focused problems"]
AF4["Current interests"]
AF5["Future pursuits"]
end
ACTIVE --> ACTIVE_FEATURES
style PASSIVE fill:#ffebee,stroke:#f44336
style ACTIVE fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
Goal 2: Develop Educational and Career Planning Skills¶
Key Outcomes
Students:
- Recognize the need to perform well in high school
- Understand educational pathways leading to rewarding careers
- Pursue postsecondary education or training
- Gain knowledge of wide variety of career-related fields
- Create career connections with professionals
Goal 3: Reach a Diverse Population¶
| Aspect | How Achieved |
|---|---|
| Express interests | Students share their own interests |
| Demonstrate skills | Show unique abilities |
| Master material | Apply variety of learning styles |
| Academic & Technical | High-level material accessible to all |
Goal 4: Build Community Support for Improving High Schools¶
| Stakeholder | Engagement |
|---|---|
| Industry | Employment opportunities, mentorship |
| Education | Curriculum support, resources |
| Community-based organizations | Local engagement, support |
Outcomes
- Support for schools
- Proactive education improvement policies
- Future employment opportunities for students
3:06:1:03 Learning Outcomes of Multi-disciplinary Curricular Approach¶
Key Points π
Interlinking many disciplines into a multi-disciplinary assignment produces the following four outcomes.
| # | Learning Outcome | Description |
|---|---|---|
| i | Application of Autonomy in Learning | Learners guided to seek information sources, investigate and understand principles |
| ii | Cultivate Practical Skills | Application of theoretical skills in practical situations |
| iii | Improves Problem-solving Skills | Analyse and compare body of knowledge between disciplines |
| iv | Connect Academics | Improve interaction and collaboration between academics of different disciplines |
Learning Outcomes Diagram¶
flowchart TB
MDC[("Multi-disciplinary<br>Curriculum")]
LO1["π― Autonomy<br>in Learning"]
LO2["π§ Practical<br>Skills"]
LO3["π§© Problem-solving<br>Skills"]
LO4["π€ Academic<br>Connections"]
MDC --> LO1
MDC --> LO2
MDC --> LO3
MDC --> LO4
style MDC fill:#ffeb3b,stroke:#f57f17
style LO1 fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3
style LO2 fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
style LO3 fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ff9800
style LO4 fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#9c27b0
Exam Tip π
Remember APPC: Autonomy, Practical skills, Problem-solving, Connect academics
Bridge β Now let's explore the Inter-disciplinary model which takes integration a step further...
3:06:2 Inter-disciplinary Curriculum Integration¶
Definition
Inter-disciplinary curriculum integration means integrating different aspects of more than one academic discipline to examine a theme, issue, question, or topic. It helps students explore various perspectives and views on the problem or topic in consideration.
flowchart TB
THEME[("π― Theme/Issue/<br>Question/Topic")]
subgraph ASPECTS["Different Aspects Integrated"]
A1["Discipline A<br>Aspect 1"]
A2["Discipline B<br>Aspect 2"]
A3["Discipline C<br>Aspect 3"]
end
A1 --> THEME
A2 --> THEME
A3 --> THEME
THEME --> PERSPECTIVES["Multiple Perspectives<br>& Views"]
style THEME fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3
style PERSPECTIVES fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
3:06:2:01 Advantages of Inter-disciplinary Teaching and Learning¶
Seven Advantages
Inter-disciplinary teaching and learning offers multiple benefits for students.
| # | Advantage | Description |
|---|---|---|
| i | Improved Comprehension & Retention | Students understand and remember better |
| ii | Real-world Application | Understand how to apply learning in real-world problems |
| iii | Inter-connected Solutions | See how solutions require content knowledge and skills from different disciplines |
| iv | Multiple Points of View | Develops multiple perspectives and values |
| v | Enhanced Decision-making | Enhanced ability to synthesize knowledge from different disciplines |
| vi | Information Assessment | Improved ability to identify, assess, and communicate important information |
| vii | Collaborative Skills | Fosters collaboration and positive attitude towards learning |
Advantages Diagram¶
flowchart TB
subgraph ADV["7 Advantages of Inter-disciplinary Approach"]
direction TB
A1["π Improved Comprehension<br>& Retention"]
A2["π Real-world<br>Application"]
A3["π Inter-connected<br>Solutions"]
A4["ποΈ Multiple<br>Points of View"]
A5["π― Enhanced<br>Decision-making"]
A6["π Information<br>Assessment"]
A7["π€ Collaborative<br>Skills"]
end
style A1 fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3
style A2 fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
style A3 fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ff9800
style A4 fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#9c27b0
style A5 fill:#ffebee,stroke:#f44336
style A6 fill:#e0f7fa,stroke:#00bcd4
style A7 fill:#fce4ec,stroke:#e91e63
3:06:2:02 Steps in Implementing Inter-disciplinary Approach in Classroom Teaching¶
Key Points π
There are six steps for implementing the inter-disciplinary approach effectively.
| Step | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| i | Pre-instructional Planning | Teacher plans topics/themes; students examine and choose |
| ii | Introducing the Methodology | Explain and demonstrate the approach to students |
| iii | Taking to the Classroom | Explain with example how to identify related disciplines |
| iv | Practising Inter-disciplinary Thinking | Present issue, use knowledge from different disciplines |
| v | Providing Feedback | Evaluate using detailed rubric |
| vi | Assessment | Teach students to self-evaluate |
Implementation Steps Flow¶
flowchart TB
S1["π Step 1:<br>Pre-instructional<br>Planning"] --> S2["π’ Step 2:<br>Introducing<br>Methodology"]
S2 --> S3["π« Step 3:<br>Taking to<br>Classroom"]
S3 --> S4["π§ Step 4:<br>Practising<br>Thinking"]
S4 --> S5["π¬ Step 5:<br>Providing<br>Feedback"]
S5 --> S6["π Step 6:<br>Assessment"]
style S1 fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3
style S2 fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
style S3 fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ff9800
style S4 fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#9c27b0
style S5 fill:#ffebee,stroke:#f44336
style S6 fill:#e0f7fa,stroke:#00bcd4
Step i: Pre-instructional Planning¶
| Activity | Description |
|---|---|
| Teacher | Plans and establishes topics/themes |
| Students | Examine and choose the one they're interested in |
| Action Plan | Teacher develops notes and open-ended questions |
Step ii: Introducing the Methodology¶
Why This Step?
Inter-disciplinary teaching is different from traditional approach, so teachers must explain and demonstrate how students should approach issues/problems.
Step iii: Taking to the Classroom¶
| Teacher Actions |
|---|
| Explain with example how to identify related disciplines |
| Show how to use insight from different connected disciplines |
| Inform students how to explore problem with inter-disciplinary lens |
Step iv: Practising Inter-disciplinary Thinking¶
flowchart LR
ISSUE["π Issue in<br>particular subject"] --> ANALYZE["π Use knowledge<br>from different<br>discipline"]
ANALYZE --> SOLUTION["π‘ Find<br>Solution"]
subgraph PRACTICE["Practice Options"]
IND["Individual work"]
GROUP["Small groups"]
CLASS["Whole class refinement"]
end
SOLUTION --> PRACTICE
style ISSUE fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ff9800
style SOLUTION fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
| Mode | Benefit |
|---|---|
| Individual | Personal understanding |
| Small Groups | Collaborative efforts, differing perspectives |
| Class Discussion | Refine analysis together |
Optional Activity
In small class settings, teachers can ask students to prepare inter-disciplinary position papers for each assigned reading.
Step v: Providing Feedback¶
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Tool | Detailed rubric |
| Focus Areas | Structure and analytical framework of relevant disciplines |
| Outcome | Feedback on ability to create integrated analysis |
Step vi: Assessment (Self-evaluation)¶
Self-evaluation Criteria
Students rate themselves on ability to:
- a) Identify and apply multiple disciplines relevant to the issue studied
- b) Synthesize insights from multiple disciplines
- c) Integrate ideas across disciplines
Purpose: Help students gauge their progress and set goals for improvement.
π Multi-disciplinary vs Inter-disciplinary Comparison¶
| Aspect | Multi-disciplinary | Inter-disciplinary |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Study topic from viewpoints of multiple disciplines | Integrate aspects of multiple disciplines to examine theme |
| Discipline Boundaries | Stay within boundaries | Boundaries blur/merge |
| Focus | Multiple perspectives, separate analysis | Integrated analysis and synthesis |
| Connection Type | Parallel study | Integrated study |
| Student Role | View from different angles | Create unified understanding |
flowchart TB
subgraph MULTI["Multi-disciplinary"]
M_TOPIC[Topic]
M_D1[Discipline 1] -.-> M_TOPIC
M_D2[Discipline 2] -.-> M_TOPIC
M_D3[Discipline 3] -.-> M_TOPIC
end
subgraph INTER["Inter-disciplinary"]
I_TOPIC[Topic]
I_D1[Discipline 1] --> I_TOPIC
I_D2[Discipline 2] --> I_TOPIC
I_D3[Discipline 3] --> I_TOPIC
I_D1 <--> I_D2
I_D2 <--> I_D3
end
style MULTI fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
style INTER fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3
π Quick Revision Table¶
| Topic | Key Point | Remember |
|---|---|---|
| 3:06 Models | Jensenius (2012) - 3 models | Multi, Inter, Trans-disciplinary |
| 3:06:1 Multi-disciplinary | Multiple viewpoints, boundaries maintained | Draw knowledge, stay within boundaries |
| 3:06:1:01 Characteristics | Steinberg (1997) - 6 characteristics | 6 A's: Academic, Authentic, Applied, Active, Adult, Assessment |
| 3:06:1:02 Goals | 4 goals | Active learning, Career planning, Diversity, Community |
| 3:06:1:03 Outcomes | 4 learning outcomes | APPC: Autonomy, Practical, Problem-solving, Connect |
| 3:06:2 Inter-disciplinary | Integrate aspects to examine theme | Multiple perspectives and views |
| 3:06:2:01 Advantages | 7 advantages | Comprehension, Real-world, Solutions, Views, Decision, Information, Collaboration |
| 3:06:2:02 Implementation | 6 steps | Planning, Introduce, Classroom, Practice, Feedback, Assessment |
π§ Memory Mnemonics¶
Steinberg's 6 Characteristics: AAAA-AA
- Academic rigor
- Authenticity
- Applied learning
- Active exploration
- Adult connections
- Assessment practices
Multi-disciplinary Goals: AIDB
- Active learning
- Increase career planning
- Diverse population
- Build community support
Implementation Steps: PITPFA
- Pre-instructional planning
- Introducing methodology
- Taking to classroom
- Practising thinking
- Feedback
- Assessment
β Review Questions¶
-
What is multi-disciplinary model of curriculum integration? Explain its characteristics, goals and learning outcomes. (A) [Ans: 3:06:1 + 3:06:1:01 to the end of 3:06:1:03]
-
Explain the inter-disciplinary model of curriculum integration and the steps involved in implementing it in classroom teaching. Point out its advantages in teaching and learning. (A) [Ans: 3:06:2 + 3:06:2:01 + 3:06:2:02]
-
Compare and contrast Multi-disciplinary and Inter-disciplinary curriculum integration.
-
What are the learning outcomes of Multi-disciplinary curricular approach?
Section Complete β
You have completed Section 3 covering:
- β Multi-disciplinary Curriculum Integration (Jensenius, 2012)
- β Steinberg's (1997) 6 Characteristics
- β 4 Goals and 4 Learning Outcomes of Multi-disciplinary approach
- β Inter-disciplinary Curriculum Integration
- β 7 Advantages of Inter-disciplinary approach
- β 6 Steps for Implementation
Next Section β Trans-disciplinary Integration & Spiral Curriculum